I just wish I could have the interface of Aperture with the performance and adjustment tools of LR. The fact that Adobe seems to always be a step ahead of Aperture in terms of adjustments to RAW files is hard to overlook.
#Photo mechanic vs bridge 8 plus
cropping, straightening, or even just a few standard bricks and then zooming in, plus it's been really slow at preparing for an external editor/plug-in). But lately, I've found performance to be pretty bad if certain things have already been done to the image (i.e. I almost switched right before Aperture 2 came out, but Apple managed to keep me with the improved performance and better adjustment tools. I'm on the verge of switching to LR again because of this. In seconds, I had a drastically better looking photo with barely any nasty chroma noise left in the image.Īm I doing something wrong in Aperture? Or is the chroma NR really that ineffective?
Then I opened the same RAW file in ACR and went to noise reduction. With Auto Noise Compensation turned on and both the Moire and Radius sliders all the way to their max, I could barely tell the difference. I started with Aperture and going to the Raw Fine Tuning brick. I also wanted to compare Aperture (my current tool of choice) with Adobe Camera Raw/Lightroom to see which one dealt with chroma noise better. So I took a random shot at 3200 and loaded it onto my Mac. With my spiffy new Canon 40D, I thought I'd do some tests of my own to see what kind of noise I got in my RAW files at 3200 ISO.
0 kommentar(er)
